Someone is profiting from your content without permission, costing you revenue and harming your reputation. The DMCA lets you remove infringing material without attorneys or lawsuits. 

This guide covers:

  • The six legal elements for a valid takedown

  • Platform-specific submission processes (Google, YouTube, social media)

  • Expected timelines and post-filing steps

  • Handling rejections and counter-notifications

  • Strategies for managing ongoing infringement at scale

Federal law under 17 U.S.C. § 512(c)(3) specifies exactly what your takedown notice must contain. Missing any element results in rejection and delays. Here's what makes your notice legally valid:

Required element

What to include

Why it matters

Your signature

Physical or electronic signature with your full legal name

Validates you're authorized to act; company names don't satisfy this requirement

Work identification

Title, copyright registration, or URL where your original content appears

Service providers need a clear description of what you own

Infringement location

Exact URLs and timestamps

Platforms must be able to locate the specific material to remove it

Contact information

Email address (required), plus optional phone and physical address

Platforms need to reach you and share info with the uploader per legal requirements

Good faith statement

"I have a good faith belief that use of the material in the manner complained of is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law."

Required legal declaration under Section 512

Perjury statement

"The information in this notification is accurate, and under penalty of perjury, I am the owner, or an agent authorized to act on behalf of the owner, of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed."

Makes false claims a federal crime with civil liability

The perjury statement has serious consequences. Under Section 512(f), knowingly making false claims can lead to lawsuits for damages, costs, and attorney fees. Before filing, ensure you own the copyright, the content is yours, and the use isn’t protected by fair use.

Platform-specific filing procedures

Each major platform has different submission systems, required formats, and processing times. Here's how to file on the platforms where most infringement occurs:

Google search results

Step

Action

1. Access form

2. Select issue

Choose "Copyright" as the removal reason

3. Provide URLs

Include search result URLs showing infringing content

4. Add original work info

Link to where your content legitimately appears

5. Complete contact details

Email, name, and signature required

6. Submit

Google reviews within 1-5 days for search results

YouTube video takedowns

YouTube takedown method

How it works

Key requirements / tips

Submit directly through your creator account.

Include infringing video URLs, timestamps, and links to your original content.

Email submission

Send a request to [email protected]

Must include all six required elements in the email body (no attachments).

Review timeline

YouTube typically reviews claims within 48 hours, but it can take 3-5 days.

Schedule takedowns 7 days in advance to allow voluntary removal and avoid strikes.

Extra protection

Use YouTube's automated blocking option.

Select “Prevent future copies” to stop re-uploads.

Social media platform submissions

Facebook and Instagram

Meta owns both platforms but requires separate submission forms:

Both ask you to specify infringement type, provide URLs to infringing posts, and submit ownership proof through links or registration documents. Meta reviews reports within 24-96 hours.

TikTok uses different forms based on content type:

Content type

Form to use

Processing time

Non-sponsored posts

Inconsistent timeframe if not a partner of TikTok.

Sponsored ads

Usually within days

X (Twitter) takedown process

Submit through the X DMCA Form in their Help Center. Select your specific issue, verify you're the rights owner, and provide URLs of both infringing content and your original work. X typically reviews forms within 3 days.

What happens after filing your takedown

Understanding post-submission outcomes helps you respond appropriately to different scenarios.

Approval vs. rejection outcomes

Outcome

What happens

our next steps

Approved

Content gets removed; infringer may receive a warning, suspension, or removal

Monitor for re-uploads; document the takedown

Rejected

Content stays live; you may or may not receive a reason

Review for errors; correct information; resubmit with complete details

Counter-notice received

The platform notifies you that someone disputes your claim

Evaluate whether to file a lawsuit within 10-14 days, or the content gets restored

Rejections usually occur due to missing information, incorrect URLs, or inadequate proof of ownership. Correct the errors and resubmit with complete details. If it’s rejected again, escalate through platform support or legal channels.

Counter-notification process

After content removal, alleged infringers can submit counter-notifications if they believe the takedown was mistaken. Under 17 U.S.C. §512(g), valid counter-notices must include:

  • User's signature

  • Identification of removed material and its former location

  • Statement under penalty of perjury that removal was a mistake

  • Consent to federal court jurisdiction

Service providers forward counter-notices to you. Evaluate whether pursuing legal action is warranted based on the infringement’s severity and the strength of your evidence.

Common errors that cause rejection

Most failed takedown requests are due to technical errors. Common mistakes include:

  • Incorrect URL Format: Use the exact link for the content (e.g., full YouTube or Facebook URLs); shortened or embedded links are rejected.

  • Missing or Invalid Signatures: Include your full legal name; company names alone are insufficient.

  • Vague Work Descriptions: Clearly identify your work with titles, publication dates, and URLs.

  • Incomplete Contact Info: Provide a valid email so platforms can communicate with you and the alleged infringer.

  • Altered Legal Statements: Use the exact wording for good faith and perjury statements required by law and platform forms.

Managing systematic content theft

Single takedowns address immediate issues but don’t prevent recurring theft, as content often reappears across platforms.

Some effective monitoring strategies include:

  • Manual monitoring: Use Google Alerts for your brand and content, check prior infringement sites weekly, monitor repeat infringers, and review competitor sites for scraping.

  • Scaling enforcement: Submit bulk reports for recurring content, document all takedown attempts, prioritize responsive platforms, and register copyrights.

Copyright registration isn’t required for DMCA notices but enables statutory damages ($750–$30,000 per work; up to $150,000 for willful infringement) and attorney fees, supporting legal action against persistent infringers.

Automated protection solutions

Manual enforcement can’t keep up when content spreads across dozens, hundreds, and sometimes thousands of sites. Automated brand protection platforms continuously scan the internet, detect unauthorized use within hours, and submit correctly formatted takedown notices automatically.

Speed is critical: removing content within 60 minutes prevents most revenue and reputation loss, while delays of weeks cause compounding harm.

The DMCA includes penalties discouraging misuse of the takedown system.

Penalties for false claims

Violation type

Potential consequences

Knowingly making material misrepresentations

Liability for damages, costs, and attorney fees under Section 512(f)

False statements under penalty of perjury

Federal perjury charges; criminal prosecution

Using DMCA for non-copyright claims

Potential sanctions: loss of takedown privileges

Section 512(f) holds anyone liable for knowingly making false statements in takedown notices or counter-notifications. Falsely claiming copyright infringement can lead to lawsuits for damages, legal costs, and attorney fees, with courts awarding substantial penalties in past cases.

The accuracy statement is signed under penalty of perjury, and intentional false claims constitute a federal crime, discouraging abuse of the takedown system.

Pre-filing verification checklist

Before submitting a takedown, ensure you:

  • Own the copyright to the work

  • Confirm the content is yours, not just similar

  • Determine if the use does not qualifies as fair use or another legal exception

  • Document the infringement with screenshots and archived URLs

  • Review all details for accuracy before signing under penalty of perjury

These steps protect you from legal liability and help maintain the integrity of the copyright system.

Protecting content at scale

Occasional vs. systematic infringement

  • Filing individual DMCA takedowns works for occasional violations.

  • When stolen content appears across dozens of sites daily, manual enforcement becomes unsustainable.

Power of the DMCA

  • The DMCA provides strong tools to protect your work.

  • Effective use at scale requires understanding legal requirements and platform-specific procedures.

Automated enforcement

  • For systematic content theft, automated detection and takedown systems are essential.

  • These platforms monitor continuously, file takedowns immediately, and track results across all sites.

  • Automation lets you focus on creating content instead of chasing infringers.

Protect your work

  • Your content reflects your time, expertise, and income.

  • With the right approach, you can quickly and effectively remove unauthorized copies.

Need automated content protection? 

Ceartas scans 75+ million websites daily and removes stolen content with a 94% success rate. Our WIPO-certified experts are ready to help with impersonation, privacy misuse, trademark violations, and other IP issues.


Keep Reading

No posts found